|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REFORM IN THE NEWS Advertiser editorial: Need for home rule shown again The Montgomery Advertiser In a land of common-sense governance, two neighboring municipalities with disputes over boundaries and tax collections could work out a mutually acceptable arrangement and get on with business. After all, it's no concern of any other entity. It's certainly not the concern of the state Legislature.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bob Blalock: Tuesday brought the good, bad and ugly for constitution reformers Bob Blalock--The Birmingham News For those who dream of a new Alabama constituiton, Tuesday's party primaries played like a Clint Eastwood spaghetti western: There was the good, the bad and the ugly. We'll save the good for later. First, the "ugly". The Birmingham News Editorial Board WWe don't suppose there are any African-American Alabamians, say, about 130 years old or so, who lost their right to vote after the 1901 Constitution of Alabama was ratified. Because that's what it would take, according to the Alabama Supreme Court, to have proper legal standing in a lawsuit claiming top state officials violated voters' rights by failing to ensure the constitution was ratified legally. The Anniston Star Editorial Board When it comes to Alabama’s 1901 Constitution, it has long been known — even acknowledged by those involved — that its ratification was shrouded in fraud. Most historians agree that in Alabama’s Black Belt, votes were cast in favor of the Constitution even though the voters never appeared at the polls. Additionally, the votes of those who did appear were either not counted or were counted for ratification when, in fact, they were cast against it. That’s why nine African-American residents in Alabama brought suit recently to have the ratification of the 1901 Constitution set aside because of voter fraud. Davis, Sparks clash over rewriting constitution By: Thomas Spencer - The Birmingham News Democratic gubernatorial candidate U.S. Rep Artur Davis continued his state tour advocating reform of Alabama’s constitution Wednesday with a stop at Vulcan Park. Davis responded to allegations leveled by Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks, his opponent in the June 1 primary, that the citizen convention Davis advocates for rewriting the state’s 1901 constitution would be dominated by “special interests.” Davis said it was a “rich irony” that Sparks instead wants to leave it to the Legislature to rewrite the constitution. That’s the center of special interest power in Alabama, Davis said. Take a deep look at our Legislature The Anniston Star As the political cliché goes, states are laboratories of democracy. So wrote Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis in 1932, and countless others have since reaffirmed the lofty sentiment. Embracing its accuracy, we must conclude that Alabama's state government is a laboratory full of mad scientists, equipped with outmoded, rusty tools. Yes, it's another rant against the 1901 Constitution. It's the gift that keeps on giving, or in our case, taking. Only in Alabama could the conservative position favor a process that calls for centralizing government power to make decisions for hundreds of localities. "Devolution" of government deeper into the grassroots was all the rage during the Republican revolution of the mid-1990s. The Randolph Leader Alabama's constitution was created in 1901 and now has 836 amendments, making it by far the largest such document in the country. Another 25 amendments will be on the ballot this fall, many of them strictly local issues that should not require a constitutional amendment or a statewide vote. Under our 1901 constitution, we are not allowed to change it unless our legislators allow us to vote on it, which they have been unwilling to do. A majority of them like things the way they are since the constitution puts all the power in their hands. Editorial: State Constitution suits lawmakers just fine The Dothan Eagle There are also times when such sarcasm begins to sound ... well ... reasonable. This week is one of those times. The Birmingham News Otherwise, they'd take to the House of Representatives gallery today, brandishing signs with not-so-clever messages like "Impeach Rep. Adolf Hitler," and shouting down lawmakers for not allowing the people of Alabama to vote on the issue. Bill to rewrite constitution killed The Montgomery Advertiser The Anniston Star Editorial Board Tuesday, that reminder arrived with a thud. Despite so many reasons to support constitutional reform — unfair taxation and concentrated power in Montgomery, for starters — the state House again screamed no. Same story, same disappointment. Let people decide what's best for them The Daily Home A local community wanted to change its form of government to allow a city manager to run the day-to-day operation. All the Vestavia City Council wanted was a professional manager to run its multi-million dollar operation. It sounded reasonable because it was. The part of this story that’s unreasonable is that the city council had to ask lawmakers in Montgomery for permission. That’s right. A city in Jefferson County cannot make that decision without first going through the Alabama Legislature. Constitution no laughing matter. Residents should demand action by legislators By The Gadsden Times Picking on the number of amendments in Alabama’s constitution is almost too easy. That the constitution has some 827 amendments already is indicative of problems with the constitution, but the real issue is more about how power is centralized in Montgomery. Three are statewide and one of them illustrates the absurdity of how Alabama’s government is structured. In November, state voters will decide if the propane gas industry can charge its members a fee to be used to promote the industry. As the kids say, really? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top | Home | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||